DIFFERENCES IN SOCIAL STRATIFICATION COMMUNITY PERCEPTIONS OF POST-TRUTH MANAGEMENT
Abstract
The post-truth phenomenon that is developing in society is having very powerful social impacts. Many lower levels of society believe in information that seems to be true, but is not supported by sufficient evidence and relative facts. The emergence of information that is not balanced with the reality of what is happening makes all groups consisting of; among students/akademics, entrepreneur, and the public in responden to the post-truth phenomenon in social life. The reasearch is aim at how society manages post-truth correctly and in a balanced manner. This research is included in the category of explanatory research, which uses hypoteses (hypothesis testing). The data sources used are nominal and primary data obtained through distributing questionnaires using a likert scale. Sampling was carried out using a purposive sampling model with certain criteria based on the sosial strata of the community, totaling 180 respondents. Dat analysis uses multivariate variance (Manova). The risearch results show that: 1) student, entrepreneurs, and public can manage post-truth by thinking critically, understanding digital literacy, and knowing social media algoritms well and wisely; 2) There is a significant difference in perspective between them (students, entrepreneurs, and public) regarding good and wise post-truth management.
References
Adam, A. W. (2006). History, Nationalism And Power.
Akliahirfiarta, B. T. (2020). Literasi Digital pada Pegawai RSUD dr. Soetomo Surabaya Brilian Trofi Akhirfiarta 1 071311633083. Journal.Unair.Ac.Id, 2, 13. http://journal.unair.ac.id/download-fullpapers-lna3e16b8d81full.pdf
Alimi, M. Y. (2019). Theorizing Internet, Religion and Post Truth: an Article Review. Komunitas, 11(2), 207–222. https://doi.org/10.15294/komunitas.v11i2.21860
Amanullah, M. G., & Dwisusilo, S. M. (2019). Post-Truth And Echo Chamber Phenomena in The Facebook of Jokowi and Prabowo. Opcion Journals, 35, 2186–2211.
Ananta, A. (2006). The Lost Benefits And Benefits Of Social Economic Statistics.
Anggraeni, H., Fauziyah, Y., & Fahyuni, E. F. (2019). Penguatan Blended Learning Berbasis Literasi Digital Dalam Menghadapi Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 9(2), 191–203. http://ejournal.radenintan.ac.id/index.php/idarohe-ISSN:2580-2453https://doi.org/10.24042/alidarah.v9i2.5168
Ferina, N., Agung, A., Sri, G., & Professor, D. (2019). Opportunities and Challenges of Instagram Algorithm in Improving Competitive Advantage. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology, 4(1), 743–747. www.ijisrt.com743
Gorwa, R. (2019). The Governance Triangle: Conceptualising the Informal Regulation of Online Content. Internet Policy Review, 8(2), 1–22.
Hadiz, V. R., & Dhakidae, D. (2005). Social Science and Power in Indonesia. Equinox Publishing.
Haq, M. N. (2022). Anatomi dan Literasi Post-Truth. Jurnal Riset Jurnalistik Dan Media Digital, 99–114. https://doi.org/10.29313/jrjmd.v2i2.1359
Jando, E., & Nani, P. A. (2018). Java Based Algorithms And Programming.
Khasanah, U., & Herina. (2019). Building Student Character Through Digital Literacy In Facing 21st Century Education (Industrial Revolution 4.0). Proceedings Of The National Seminar On Postgraduate Education Program At PGRI Of University Palembang, 999–1015.
Krasmann, S. (2020). The logic of the surface: on the epistemology of algorithms in times of big data. Information Communication and Society, 23(14), 2096–2109. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2020.1726986
Kurnianingsih, I., Rosini, & Ismayati, N. (2017). (literacy)Upaya Peningkatan Kemampuan Literasi Digital bagi Tenaga. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 3(1), 61–76. http://jurnal.ugm.ac.id/jpkm
Lay, A., & Ferwerda, B. (2018). Predicting users’ personality based on their “liked” images on instagram. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, 2068(March).
Lie, H. D. (2009). Middle Ages, modernism & postmodernism. Stulos Theological Journal, 8(1), 1–7.
Maulana. (2017). Basic Concepts of Mathematics and Development of Critical-Creative Thinking Abilities.
Mccomiskey, B. (2017). Post-Truth Rhetoric and Composition.
Munir. (2017). Digital Learning.
Padli, M. S., & Mustofa, Ml. (2021). Kebenaran Dalam Perspektif Filsafat Serta Aktualisasinya Dalam Men-Screening Berita. Jurnal Filsafat Indonesia, 4(1), 78–88. https://doi.org/10.23887/jfi.v4i1.31892
Pangrazio, L. (2016). Reconceptualising critical digital literacy. Discourse, 37(2), 163–174. https://doi.org/10.1080/01596306.2014.942836
Purba, H., & Sitorus, F. K. (2023). Truth, Post Truth, dan Dinamikanya di Indonesia: Sebuah Kajian Literatur. Sosial Horizon: Jurnal Pendidikan Sosial, 10(1), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.31571/sosial.v10i1.5001
Rakhmani, I., & Saraswati, M. S. (2021). Authoritarian Populism in Indonesia: The Role of the Political Campaign Industry in Engineering Consent and Coercion. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 40(3), 436–460. https://doi.org/10.1177/18681034211027885
Setiadi, E. M., & Kolip, U. (2011). Introduction To Sociology: Understanding The Facts And Symptoms Of Social Problems: Theory, Application And Solutions.
Sihotang, A. (2017). Human Resources Management.
Subandi, L. (1995). Development of Religious Life. Jogyakarta, Faculty of Psychology UGM.
Tapsell, R. (2017). The political economy of digital media.
Walisyah, T. (2024). UTILIZATION OF INSTAGRAM AS INFORMATION MEDIA IN SUPPORTING THE ACTIVITIES OF IBNU AQIL ISLAMIC BOARDING SCHOOL MEDAN. 4(2), 251–259. https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v4i2.102
Widodo Dwi Putro. (2020). Finding Legal Truth in the Post-Truth Era. Sanabil.
Copyright (c) 2025 Moestopo International Review on Social, Humanities, and Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.