CRITICISM, INNOVATION, AND ADAPTATION OF GOVERNANCE: FROM CLASSIC TO NEW PUBLIC AND DIGITAL AMID GLOBAL CHALLENGES
Abstract
This study examines significant developments in the field of governance, tracing its transition from a classical paradigm dominated by hierarchical structures and rigid bureaucracy to a more dynamic and responsive model. Amidst the complexity of global challenges such as economic uncertainty, environmental crises, and technological disruptions, traditional governance approaches are often sharply criticized for their limitations in providing adaptive and sustainable solutions. This abstract analyzes how criticism of the classical model has become a catalyst for innovation, driving the adoption of New Public Governance (NPG), which emphasizes partnerships, multi-actor networks, and the creation of shared public value. In addition, this study explores the transformative role of Digital Governance in revolutionizing the way governments interact with citizens and provide services, increasing efficiency, transparency, and inclusion through the use of information and communication technology. With a focus on innovation and adaptation, this article aims to understand how governance systems strive to remain relevant and effective amid an ever-changing global landscape. This analysis not only highlights the historical and conceptual journey but also provides crucial insights into the need for a flexible, collaborative, and future-oriented governance framework to address the multidimensional challenges of the 21st century.
References
Bertot, J. C., Jaeger, P. T., & Grimes, J. M. (2010). Using Information and Communication Technology (ICT) to create a culture of transparency: E-government and social media as tools for openness and anti-corruption for governments. Government Information Quarterly, 27(3).
Dawes, S. S. (2008). The future of e-government: A vision for the coming decade. Proceedings of the 41st Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science.
Dunleavy, P., Margetts, H., Bastow, S., & Tinkler, J. (2006). New public management . LSE Public Policy Group.
Fung, A., & Wright, E. O. (2003). Deepening democracy: Innovation in empowered participatory governance.. 3–42.
Heeks, R. (2002). eGovernment in Africa: Promise and practice. Paper presented at the International Conference on E-Government, London.
Janssen, M., & Van der Voort, H. (2016). Challenges and opportunities in building smart government. Information Systems Frontiers, 18(2), 1–13.
Kettl, D. F. (2002). Governance Transformation: Public Administration for 21st Century America. Johns Hopkins University Press.
Kooiman, J. (2003). Managing as governance. Sage Publications.
Layne, K., & Lee, J. (2001). Developing a fully functional e-government: A four-stage model. Government Information Quarterly, 18(2), 122–136.
Macintosh, A. (2004). Describing electronic participation in policy formation. Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science.
Moore, M. H. (1995). Proceedings of the 37th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. Harvard University Press.
OECD. (2020). The COVID-19 crisis: A catalyst for public sector innovation? OECD Publishing.
Osborne, D., & Gaebler, T. (1992). Reforming government: How entrepreneurial spirit is transforming the public sector. Addison-Wesley.
Osborne, S. P. (2006). New Public Governance? Public Management Review, 8(3), 377–387.
UN. (2020). UN E-Government Survey 2020: Digital Government in the Decade of Action for Sustainable Development.
Peters, B. G., & Pierre, J. (1998). Governance without government? Rethinking public administration. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 8(2), 223–243.
Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2000). Governance, Politics, and the State. St. Martin’s Press.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1996). New governance: Managing without government. Political Studies, 44(4), 652–667.
Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance: Policy networks, governance, reflexivity, and accountability. Open University Press.
Rittel, H. W. J., & Webber, M. M. (1973). Dilemmas in general planning theory. Policy Science, 4(2), 155–169.
Stoker, G. (1998). Governance as theory: Five propositions. International Social Science Journal, 50(155), 17–28.
Copyright (c) 2025 Moestopo International Review on Social, Humanities, and Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.









