COMPARISON OF  ORTHODONTIC TREATMENT RESULTS WITH INVISALIGN AND FIXED APPLIANCE USING PEER ASSESSMENT RATING INDEX

Evie Lamtiur Pakpahan

doi:10.32509/mirshus.v3i1.47

Evie Lamtiur Pakpahan University of Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama), Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v3i1.47

Keywords: peer assessment rating index, Invisalign, conventional fixed appliance, anterior crowding, malocclusion

Abstract

Malocclusion is defined as a condition that deviates from normal occlusion. Crowding is the most common malocclusion. Orthodontic treatment is a field of dentistry that plays an essential role in improving facial esthetics, function and stability of good treatment results. Orthodontic treatment offers several methods, such as conventional fixed orthodontic appliances and invisalign. The PAR index is an instrument used to measure deviations from ideal occlusion and to evaluate the results of orthodontic treatment quantitatively by comparing pre-and post-treatment dental models. Purpose: This study aims to compare the efficacy of orthodontic treatment results with invisalign and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances using the PAR Index. Methods: Analyzing databases such as Google Scholar, textbook, Elsevier, PubMed, and various national and international journal websites related to the title of this literature. The references have been selected based on relevant analysis and published in the last ten years, specifically from 2011 to 2021. Results: Based on the PAR index score, there were no significant differences in the efficacy of orthodontic treatment results with invisalign and conventional fixed orthodontic appliances. Conclusion: Both Invisalign and fixed appliances were able to improve the malocclusion. However, Invisalign may not be as effective as fixed appliances

References

Alam MK. A to Z Orthodontics: Fixed Appliances.Malaysia:PPSP Publication; 2012.

Bellot-Arcis C, Monitel-Company JM, Almerich-Silla JM. Psychosocial Impact of Malocclusion in Spanish Adolescents. Korean J Orthods. 2013; 43(4): 193- 200.

Bowman, SJ More than Lip Service: Facial Esthetics in Orthodontics, JADA, Vol. 130, August 1999, 1173-1181

Gu J, Tang JS, Skulski B, Jr HWF, Beck FM, Firestone AR, Kim D, Deguchi T. Evaluation of Invisalign Treatment Effectiveness and Efficiency Compared with Conventional Fixed Appliances using The Peer Assessment Rating Index. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics. 2017;151(2):259-266.

Ke Y, Zhu Y, Zhu M. A Comparison of Treatment Effectiveness Between Clear Aligner and Fixed Appliance Therapies. BMC Oral Health. 2019; 19(24): 2.

Kislaya, B Shivani, G Vishal. Invisalign: A Transparent Braces. Journal of Advanced Medical and Dental Sciences Research. 2018; 6(7):148-50.

L Valentina, F Giampietro, L Claudio, C Rosanna, C Gianguido. The Efficacy of Orthodontic Treatments for Anterior Crowding with Invisalign Compared with Fixed Appliances using The Peer Assessment Rating Index. Quintessence International. 2018;49 (7): 581-87.

Millett D, Welbury R. Orthodontics and Paediatric Dentistry. London: Harcourt Publishers Limited; 2000.

Riyanti E, Indriyanti R, Primarti RS. Prevalensi Maloklusi dan Gigi Berjejal Berdasarkan Jenis Kelamin dan Umur pada Anak-Anak Sekolah Dasar di Bandung. Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat. 2018: 2(12).

Rahul S, J Bhuvan, K Sachin, S Anu. Sequential Removable Orthodontics: An Alternative Approach. International Journal of Contemporary Medicine Surgery and Radiology. 2017;2(1): 32- 36.