IMPROVING TECHNICAL TRAINING PERFORMANCE WITH KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES

  • Taufiqurokhman Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
  • Watriningsih University of Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama), Jakarta
  • Lilik Sumarni Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta
Keywords: Performance, Knowledge, management principles

Abstract

Programs (EDP) which main purpose is to accelerate learning process for fresh graduate new employees in the first five years of their career. Based on the survey result and the focus group discussion, there are two valid root causes of the problem, which are training planning process quality and training execution quality. The focus group discussion also resulted in business solutions to solve the problem by considering KM Metrics (Participation, Capture and Reuse) including: improve planning process and availability of training information by improving web-based information system, add more Guided Experience (GE) program and utilize IBU Subject Matter Expert (SME) to reduce dependency on overseas instructor as well as to encourage participation, capture and reuse of information within business unit, and using technology for implementing long distance learning (tele-conference training, etc).

References

Eka, Y., Ningrum, P., & Welly, J. (2012). Analysis of talent development influence on employee productivity at hr centre bandung pt. telekomunikasi indonesia 2011. The Indonesian Journal of Business Administration, 1(1), 28–33. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1EwpygNI_hlTi3AqshWaqcLSAg8n8IIdH&usp=drive_fs

Geoghegan, M., Cormican, K., & Wu, Q. (2021). Sustainable team design: a challenge to traditional beliefs in information-intensive service industries. Sustainability (Switzerland), 13(24), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3390/su132413552

Hamdan, L., Al-Abbadi, M., Zuhier, R., Almomani, Q., Rajab, A., Alhaleem, A., Rumman, A., Mohammad, A., & Khraisat, I. (2019). Impact of human capital development and human capital isolation mechanisms on innovative performance: evidence from industrial companies in jordan. 11(15), 84–96. https://doi.org/10.7176/EJBM

Liebowitz, J. (2012). Knowledge management handbook. In Knowledge Management Handbook (Jay Liebow). https://doi.org/10.1201/b12285

Management, T., Mayo, M., Meindl, J. R., Pastor, J. C., Leithwood, K., Mascall, B., Leadership, D., Kocolowski, M., Grint, K., Mendenhall, M. E., Marsh, W. J., Friedrich, T. L., Vessey, W. B., Schuelke, M. J., Ruark, G. A., Mumford, M. D., Kramer, M. W., Crespy, D. A., Somboonpakorn, A., … Available, E. (2020). Connections and the emergence of shared leadership in. Leadership Quarterly, 31(4), 421–424. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.04.002%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2019.101346%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2018.10.027%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.10.089%0Ahttps://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhm.2018.02.003%0Ahttp://dx.doi.org/10.1016

Models, C. C. (2016). Knowledge management in software developing organizations. combining conceptual models. Issues In Information Systems, 17(I), 211–220. https://doi.org/10.48009/1_iis_2016_211-220

Theodoridis, T., & Kraemer, J. (n.d.-a). Knowledge menegement in theory and practice (2005th ed.). https://drive.google.com/open?id=1EndjgzQWfqNmH6clPMYee-zzGtNeTamE&usp=drive_fs

Theodoridis, T., & Kraemer, J. (n.d.-b). Leadesrdhip development: an assessment of the aspiring leaders program at the Texas commission on eviromental quality. https://drive.google.com/open?id=1F54ErQZgVWX-LaJsfQAnp2oNtTdynfcQ&usp=drive_fs

Published
2023-12-30
How to Cite
Taufiqurokhman, Watriningsih, & Sumarni, L. (2023). IMPROVING TECHNICAL TRAINING PERFORMANCE WITH KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES . Moestopo International Review on Social, Humanities, and Sciences, 3(2), 102-117. https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v3i2.53
Section
Articles