Analyzing Potential Misuse of Notarial and PPAT Deeds for Covert Gratification

Angela Benita Budiman; Azka Nisa Al Birra; Oxanifer; Taufiqurokhman; Watriningsih

doi:10.32509/mirshus.v6i1.162

Angela Benita Budiman Universitas Pelita Harapan, Banten , Indonesia
Azka Nisa Al Birra Universitas Pelita Harapan, Banten , Indonesia
Oxanifer Universitas Pelita Harapan, Banten , Indonesia
Taufiqurokhman Universitas Muhammadiyah Jakarta, Banten, Indonesia
Watriningsih Universitas Prof. Dr. Moestopo (Beragama), Jakarta, Indonesia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v6i1.162

Keywords: Notary, Gratuities, Authentic Deed

Abstract

This study aims to examine the potential misuse of notarial and Land Deed Official (PPAT) deeds as formal legal instruments that may operate as concealed channels for illicit gratuities, while also proposing preventive measures to mitigate associated risks. The research employs a normative-empirical approach by integrating statutory analysis with a conceptual framework, focusing on the Law on Notary Office, anti-corruption regulations, and patterns of disguised gratification practices involving authentic deeds. The findings demonstrate that covert gratuities can be facilitated through various notarial documents, particularly sale and purchase agreements, loan contracts, and grant deeds, which may be deliberately structured to obscure unlawful benefits. The study concludes that preventing such misuse requires strengthening professional diligence and regulatory compliance. First, notaries and PPAT officials must rigorously verify the factual accuracy of information provided by the parties and ensure its proper legal formulation, guided by principles of transparency, prudence, and accountability. Second, the consistent implementation of customer due diligence and accurate identification procedures is essential to minimize abuse. These measures are crucial for enhancing legal certainty and maintaining public trust in notarial institutions.

Author Biographies

Angela Benita Budiman, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Banten , Indonesia

Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum

Azka Nisa Al Birra, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Banten , Indonesia

Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum

Oxanifer, Universitas Pelita Harapan, Banten , Indonesia

Magister Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum

References

Adejare Tajudeen, A., & Timothy Adesanmi, A. (2023). Is Tax Income Pertinent to Government Contributions to Pensions and Gratuities Empirical Verdict from CoIntegration. In Kardan Journal of Economics and Manangement Sciences. Kardan University. https://doi.org/10.31841/kjems.2023.140

Arief, R. R. (2025). Effectiveness of rosella on bone repair. 5(2), 192–204. https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v5i2.105

BUSHTETS, N. V. (2023). RUSSIAN NOTARY: HISTORY AND MODERNITY. In Нотариальный вестник (Vol. 11). Legal Culture Development Fund. https://doi.org/10.53578/1819-6624_2023_11_40

Dolynska, M. (2024). LIABILITY INSURANCE OF A PRIVATE NOTARY AS A NECESSARY CONDITION FOR ACCESS TO PRIVATE NOTARY PRACTICE IN UKRAINE. In Bulletin of Luhansk Scientific-Educational Institute named after E.O. Didorenko (Vol. 1, Number 2, pp. 102–114). Luhansk State University of Internal Affairs named after E.O. Didorenko. https://doi.org/10.33766/2786-9156.106.1.102-114

Gibson, W. (2022). Economics and History of Restaurant Gratuities. In SSRN Electronic Journal. Elsevier BV. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4293452

Ginting, J., Talbot, P., & Darryl, E. (2023). Legal Pluralism Perspective in Prosecuting Perpetrators of Bribery and Gratuities Corruption Crimes. In Jurnal Konstitusi (Vol. 20, Number 4, pp. 721–736). Constitutional Court of the Republic of Indonesia. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk2049

Giritono, D. (2020). Legal Protection for Notary Public in Performing Their Duties As A General Officer Based on Law of Notary Office in Kendari Region. In Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (Vol. 2, Number 4, p. 624). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.4.624-635

Hussein, S., & Hafidz, J. (2020). Standing Authentic Evidence Which Application Made By Notary-PPAT Of Uitvoerbaar Bij Voorraad (Ruling That Can Run Over First). In Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (Vol. 2, Number 2, p. 55). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.2.55-62

Jarkov, V. V. (2021). QUO VADIS NOTARY PUBLIC? In Нотариальный вестник (Number 4, pp. 5–13). Foundation for the Development of Legal Culture. https://doi.org/10.53578/1819-6624_2021_4_5

Jasmine, T., Arpangi, A., & Setyawati, S. (2022). Responsibility of Notary Letter Approval on Under Hands Contract. In Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (Vol. 4, Number 1, p. 202). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.4.1.202-220

Karimova, M. (2022). DIGITAL NOTARY: CURRENT STATUS AND PROSPECTS. In Jurisprudence (Vol. 2, Number 4, pp. 71–77). Tashkent State University of Law. https://doi.org/10.51788/tsul.jurisprudence.2.4./qfwm6509

Konoplyannikova, T., & Shagivaleeva, I. (2021). NOTARY SUPPORT EVIDENCE ON THE INTERNET. In East European Scientific Journal (Vol. 2, Number 5, pp. 24–27). Logic + LLC. https://doi.org/10.31618/essa.2782-1994.2021.2.69.54

Konstantinov, P. D. (2022). BLOCKCHAIN: DOES THE NOTARY HAVE A FUTURE? In Нотариальный вестник (Number 9, pp. 56–61). Foundation for the Development of Legal Culture. https://doi.org/10.53578/1819-6624_2022_9_56

Lamplmair, P., Pfeifhofer, S., & Berger, B. (2023). Data Notary—Auditable Data as a Basis for Monetization. In The Monetization of Technical Data (pp. 195–208). Springer Berlin Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-66509-1_12

Logvynenko, M., & Taran, S. (2024). MEDIATION IN THE NOTARY: HARMONIOUS RESOLUTION OF LEGAL DISPUTES. In Scientific Journal of Polonia University (Vol. 62, Number 1, pp. 182–187). Polonia University in Czestochowa. https://doi.org/10.23856/6224

Mahbub, W., & Hafidz, J. (2020). Legal Review of Legalization and Waarmerking by Indonesian Notary. In Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (Vol. 2, Number 1, p. 32). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.1.32-40

Marchenko, V. M. (2020). EXERCISE OF SUBJECTIVE CIVIL RIGHTS: NOTARY ASPECT. In Private and public law (Number 3, pp. 24–29). Publishing House Helvetica (Publications). https://doi.org/10.32845/2663-5666.2020.3.5

Marshella, & Tjempaka. (2020). Judicial Review Regarding Sanctions for Notary/Land Deed Officer Who Made Authentic Deeds for Land Based on Private Bequest Deed (Case Study of The Supreme Court’s Decision Number 1477 K/PDT/2019). In Proceedings of the 2nd Tarumanagara International Conference on the Applications of Social Sciences and Humanities (TICASH 2020). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.201209.134

Maskanah, U., & Oktavia, D. M. (2020). The Power of Authentication of Notary Deed in Justice in Indonesia. In International Journal of Latin Notary (Vol. 1, Number 1, pp. 5–9). Magister of Notary, Universitas Pasundan. https://doi.org/10.61968/journal.v1i1.2

Mentzer, M. S. (2021). The Tipping Dilemma: Restaurant Gratuities in Canada. In Journal of Tourism and Leisure Studies (Vol. 6, Number 2, pp. 1–10). Common Ground Research Networks. https://doi.org/10.18848/2470-9336/cgp/v06i02/1-10

Mohammed, S., Garba, S., Sani, A. A., Ibrahim, R. T., Muhammad, Y. M., & Kassim, I. A. (2024). Pay As You Earn (PAYE) Tax as Panacea to Backlog of Gratuities and Pensions of Civil Servants in Nigeria. In Journal of Accounting and Taxation (Vol. 4, Number 2, pp. 19–40). Training & Research Institute Jeramba Ilmu Sukses. https://doi.org/10.47747/jat.v4i2.1798

Negodyaev, V. V. (2021). REGISTRATION OF PLEDGE NOTICES IN THE NOTARY REGISTER. In Нотариальный вестник (Number 7, pp. 5–18). Foundation for the Development of Legal Culture. https://doi.org/10.53578/1819-6624_2021_7_5

Nwaeze, C. (2024). Pensions and Gratuities, Public Debt Servicing and Economic Growth of Nigeria. In African Journal of Management and Business Research (Vol. 17, Number 1, pp. 326–343). African Tulip Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.62154/ajmbr.2024.017.010531

POGOSIAN, E. V. (2023). PROVIDING EVIDENCE BY THE NOTARY: PROBLEMATIC ISSUES. In Нотариальный вестник (Vol. 12). Legal Culture Development Fund. https://doi.org/10.53578/1819-6624_2023_12_42

qatawneh, I. Al. (2022). The Criminal Liability of the Licensed Notary in Jordanian Law. In The Criminal Liability of the Licensed Notary in Jordanian Law (Vol. 14, Number 1, pp. 13–46). Mutah University. https://doi.org/10.35682/jjlps.v14i1.317

Rabanirajona, H. (2020). Role of Notary in Abroad and Indonesia. In Jurnal Akta (Vol. 7, Number 4, p. 343). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v7i4.12900

RADULOVIĆ, D., & ZARUBICA, S. (2021). NEED AND REASONS FOR INSURANCE OF NOTARY PUBLICS DURING NOTARY ACTIVITY. In Kultura polisa (pp. 135–155). Kultura - Polis. https://doi.org/10.51738/kpolisa2021.18.2p.1.10

Raghubir, P., & Bluvstein, S. (2023). From bribes to bequests and gifts to gratuities: The black, white, and shades of gray of how and why consumers pay what they want. In Consumer Psychology Review (Vol. 7, Number 1, pp. 75–92). Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/arcp.1099

Shevchenko, S. N. (2021). IMPROVEMENT OF THE PROCEDURE OF DETERMNING NOTARY FEES. In Vestnik of Lobachevsky University of Nizhni Novgorod (Number 2, pp. 174–179). National Research Lobachevsky State University of Nizhny Novgorod. https://doi.org/10.52452/19931778_2021_2_174

Sonbai, E. A. P. K., Mahendrawati, N. L. M., & Santika, I. B. A. P. (2022). QUALIFICATION OF THE PRUDENCE PRINCIPLE OF NOTARY ON IMPLEMENT THE POSITION BASED ON ACT OF NOTARY POSITION. In NOTARIIL Jurnal Kenotariatan (Vol. 7, Number 1, pp. 32–38). Universitas Warmadewa. https://doi.org/10.22225/jn.7.1.2022.32-38

Taufiqurohman, T. (2021). LEGAL DUE TO ADVANTAGE WITHOUT NOTARY NOTARY DECLARED FROM ISLAMIC LAW COMPILATIONS AND CODE OF CIVIL LAW. In Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (Vol. 2, Number 4, p. 704). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.4.704-712

Tkacheva, V. S., & Barankova, V. V. (2023). PROBLEMS OF ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROL OF ACTIVITY NOTARY OFFICE. In Amparo (Number 3, pp. 22–27). Zaporizhzhia National University. https://doi.org/10.26661/2786-5649-2023-3-03

Triwinata, J. (2025). INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY UTILIZATION AND ITS IMPACT ON SERVICE EFFECTIVENESS IN WEST. 5(2), 205–216. https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v5i2.132

Ulezko, A. Yu., & Polishchuk, P. O. (2022). Russian notary in the conditions of digitalization. In Аграрное и земельное право (Number 6, pp. 63–64). Limited Liability Company - Publishing Law and State Press. https://doi.org/10.47643/1815-1329_2022_6_63

Victoria, O. A., Ariyana, A. R., & Arifani, D. (2020). Code of Ethics and Position of Notary in Indonesia. In Sultan Agung Notary Law Review (Vol. 2, Number 4, p. 397). Universitas Islam Sultan Agung. https://doi.org/10.30659/sanlar.2.4.397-407

Wiejak-Roy, G., & Williams, A. (2023). Gifts, gratuities, and hospitality in business development practices - the perceptions of stakeholders within the alternative real estate lending market. In 29th Annual European Real Estate Society Conference. European Real Estate Society. https://doi.org/10.15396/eres2023_125

Zhuravlyova, Z. (2020). Administrative and legal regulation of electronic notary functioning. In Entrepreneurship, Economy and Law (Number 12, pp. 148–151). Research Institute of Private Law and Entrepreneurship named after Academician F.H. Burchak of the National Academy of Legal Sciences of Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.32849/2663-5313/2020.12.25