WHY DOES HOMELESS GOVERNANCE IS NOT WORKING IN LOCAL GOVERNMENT?

Ripdah Alifa; Alma 'Arif

doi:10.32509/mirshus.v4i2.76

Ripdah Alifa Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri
Alma 'Arif Institut Pemerintahan Dalam Negeri

DOI: https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v4i2.76

Keywords: Governance, Homeless, Control

Abstract

The number of homeless in Tangerang Regency is the highest in Banten province, so a government commitment is needed to control the high number of homeless in Tangerang Regency. This study aims to identify and describe the factors that cause the governance of homelessness prevention in Tangerang District not to be optimal by using the constructivism paradigm that relies on qualitative data with an inductive approach. The data analysis technique used is thematic analysis with the coding method. The results of the study illustrate that the governance of homeless control in Tangerang Regency is still not running optimally. There are several factors affecting the homelessness governance is not working, namely the lack of human resources, lack of infrastructure, and lack of accredited LKSA by the Ministry of Social Affairs. The concept of governance is needed in controlling vagrancy so that the government plays a role in involving other actors in realizing good governance.

References

Andayani Listyawati. (2008). Penanganan anak terlantar: melalui panti asuhan milik perorangan.

BPS Kabupaten Tangerang. (2023). Kabupaten Tangerang dalam angka.

Creswell, J. W. (2023). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches (6th ed.) (Sixth). SAGE Publications, Inc.

Dinas Sosial. (n.d.). Perubahan Renstra Dinsos Kabupaten Tangerang.

Dinas Sosial Kabupaten Tangerang. (2023). LKSA Terakreditasi.

Dinas Sosial Provinsi Banten. (2022). Buku Pemutakhiran Data PMKS dan PSKS Dinas Sosial Provinsi Banten.

Fifiyanti, D. & Damanik, J. (2021). Pemetaan Peran dan Kontribusi Pemangku Kepentingan dalam Pengembangan Ekowisata Desa Burai. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v10i3.36893

Izana, N. N., Susanti, A., & Afala, L. O. M. (2022). TATA KELOLA LOKAL DAN COVID-19: PERLINDUNGAN KESEHATAN DAN EKONOMI DI DESA PUJON KIDUL. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.23887/jish.v11i3.45436

Kasmir. (2016). Manajemen Sumber Daya Manusia. PT Rajagrafindo Persada.

Kiger, M. E., & Varpio, L. (2020). Thematic Analysis of Qualitative Data: AMEE Guide No. 131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159X.2020.1755030

Kooiman, J. (1993). Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. SAGE Publications, Inc.

Matthews, F. (2012). Governance and State Capacity. In D. Levi Faur (Ed.). Oxford University Press.

Pakpahan, R. T. (2024). EVALUATING IMPLEMENTATION OF E-GOVERNMENT PUBLIC SERVICES IN DKI JAKARTA TOWARDS A SMART CITY USING THE CIPP AND KIRKPATRICK EVALUATION MODEL. 4(1), 88–99. https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v4i1.86

Pierre, J., & Peters, B. G. (2021). Advanced Introduction to Governance. UK Edward Elgar Publishing.

Setyowati, E. (2019). TATA KELOLA PEMERINTAHAN DESA PADA PERBEDAAN INDEKS DESA MEMBANGUN (IDM): STUDI TIGA DESA DI KABUPATEN MALANG. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik, 9. https://doi.org/https://badge.dimensions.ai/details/doi/10.15575/jispo.v9i2.5324?domain=https://journal.uinsgd.ac.id

Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian, Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suranto dan Darumurti, A. (2024). Local Wisdom-Based Policy Innovation in Indonesia During 2018-2021. Journal of Governance and Public Policy, 11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.18196/jgpp.v11i1.16920

Taufiqurokhman, Watriningsih, & Sumarni, L. (2023). IMPROVING TECHNICAL TRAINING PERFORMANCE WITH KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRINCIPLES. Moestopo International Review on Societies, Humanities, and Sciences (MIRSHuS), 3(2), 102–117. https://doi.org/10.32509/mirshus.v3i2.53

Tiihonen, S. (2004). From governing to governance : a process of change.